GCCA+ scaling-up agriculture adaptation to climate change in Uganda

At a glance

2018-01-01 to 2023-01-01
Active programmes
Total budget
8,00 M€
GCCA priority area(s)

The Ugandan economy and wellbeing of the population are intricately linked to natural environment and therefore, highly vulnerable to climate change. The climate change trends observed worldwide have also been confirmed in Uganda, manifested through increased temperatures, erratic rainfalls and extreme events. According to available meteorological data, mean countrywide annual temperatures have risen by 1.3°C since 1960, averaging a 0.28°C increase per decade. Annual and seasonal rainfalls have decreased significantly across the country since 1960. Rainfall has also become more unpredictable and poorly distributed. Between 2010 and 2013, damages and losses in the agriculture sector caused by the 2010-2011 rainfall deficit were estimated at Euro 699 million, and included crop production losses, animal deaths, livestock production losses and higher production costs. In late 2015 and early 2016, a ‘super El Nino’ event exacerbated the regularly increasing annual impacts of climate change, with flooding leading to loss of homes, latrines and public buildings, damage to roads, reduced food security, and outbreaks of cholera. El Nino events occur every 2 to 7 years, with ‘Super El Nino’ events approximately every 15 years. The Economic Assessment of the Impacts of climate change in Uganda (2015) presents estimates of the costs of inaction under climate variability and change, for the agriculture and water sectors amongst others. Between 2010 and 2050, damages could amount to somewhere between Euro 126 and 234 billion for these two sectors alone, if no action is taken.

Among Uganda’s geographic regions, the ‘cattle corridor’ is especially vulnerable. The area is dominated by pastoral rangelands where livestock is raised with scarce water and pasture, due to environmental degradation, partially related to opening of new land for pasture, and fuelwood and charcoal production. This corridor has many semi-arid characteristics including: i) high rainfall variability; ii) periodic late onset rains/droughts; and iii) historical reliance on mobile pastoralism as an important strategy to cope with resource variability. But mobile pastoralism and migration are becoming less effective, and are heightening the risks of violent conflict, due to increased mining activity, increasing numbers of incoming migrants arriving from neighbouring countries, and fragmentation of the cattle corridor by increasing numbers of farms.1

Uganda’s resilience to climate change, its pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals and ‘middle- income country’ status, are obstructed by significant, persisting gender gaps in agriculture[1] [2]. The country ranks as number 73 out of 102 countries on the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) devised by the OECD.[3]The Country Gender Analysis report[4]highlighted gender inequalities in the agriculture sector, as a result of lower education and literacy, disproportionate responsibility for unpaid care and domestic work in the household, unequal bargaining power, limited control and entitlement over productive and natural resources and assets including land; limited physical mobility, less use of modern farm inputs, and limited access to extension services.

Climate change impacts in Uganda have significant gender implications due to the different roles, needs, capacities and positioning of women and men. As a consequence, women and men are exposed to different risks and vulnerabilities[5]. Women are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, notably food insecurity, water shortage and fuel wood scarcity, due to their expected roles in the family to avail and cook food, and fetch water and firewood. Women face a greater burden of unpaid care labour, compared to men, due to cultural traditions and social norms, restricting women’s time in enhancing their adaptive capacity[6]. Women and girls are in a more disadvantaged predicament due to gender discriminative social norms and customs[7], which are main detriments to climate change adaptation and mitigation[8]. Extreme climate events also trigger required changes of farming practices and farm decisions by both women and men, yet the decision-making power of women at both household and community level remains unequal to that of men. This impacts directly on the women’s choices of land plots quality, types of climate resilient crop and livestock, adoption of adaptation and mitigation practices, and investments in water schemes to adapt to climate change[9].

The Uganda Climate Change Policy (2013) recognises that women are also agents of change, due to their daily interaction with the natural environment. According to the MWE[10], the effects of climate change have led to women taking non-traditional gender roles and engagement in more income generating activities in order to provide for their families.



[1]         https://cdkn.org/2016/09/uganda action migration/

[2]         Cost the Gender Gaps in Agriculture, UN Women, 2015

[3]         http://www.genderindex.org/country/uganda

[4]         Country Gender Analysis, EUD, UN Women and Government in Uganda

[5]     Gender and Climate Change, assessing impacts and strategies for mitigation and adaptation to CC in Uganda, 2012

[6]     FAO-GCCA Gender Analysis Report, 2015

[7]     OECD. (2015). Uganda SIGA Country Report. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/zkhAO1

[8]     FAO-GCCA Gender Analysis Report, 2014; FAO-GCCA Gender Stocktaking Report, 2016

[9]     Gender Needs Assessment Report, FAO Uganda, NAP-Ag Programme, 2017

[10]  Ministry of Water and Environment, etal (2012). Gender and Climate Change: Assessing Impacts and Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change in Uganda. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/v9I5Lh

GCCA's action programme
Geographical scope
Initial GCCA/GCCA+ contribution
8,000,000.00 €

Objectifs spécifiques

The Specific Objective is to strengthen inclusive, gender responsive and climate smart resilience of rural populations depending on agricultural production systems in the cattle corridor. Resilience in terms of adaptation indicates how prepared the government (national and local) and communities are to face climate change


Result 1: Knowledge and Institutional Capacities for Gender-Responsive Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation are strengthened

Result 2: Household income and climate resilient livelihood capacities improved in a gender ­responsive manner

Result 3: Ecosystems adaptive and mitigation capacities enhanced


Result 1: 

  • Support capacities of national government institutions and DLG for gender- transformative climate change adaptation and mitigation 
  • Support capacities of non-state actors (CSOs and private sector) to support climate change adaptation and mitigation developed
  • Identify and share lessons learned and best practices among stakeholders


Result 2: 

  • Promote sustainable and gender-responsive climate resilient agriculture production practices 
  • Establish appropriate small and medium scale agricultural water management system to support crop and livestock
  • Promote agro-based gender-responsive income generating opportunities and linkages with the private sector along selected value chains
  • Enhance household dynamics on gender equality and gender relations, to support climate-resilient production


Result 3: 

  • Promote bio-energy plantations, biogas models, and energy saving technologies 
  • Develop capacities of LAs, NGOs, and local communities to plan, implement and mobilize resources for ecosystem based adaptation and mitigation 
  • Rehabilitate degraded watershed ecosystems 

Achievements to date
  • The project coordination team (both national and district level) established and functional.
  • Some core office equipment and vehicles for the Climate Change Unit procured.
  • Letter of Agreement between FAO and Ministry of Water and Environment 
  • Baseline survey of the target districts completed